Skip to content

Series Introduction

Published:

In a few weeks, Salem City Council will decide whether to change its current city seal. Local Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) community members have repeatedly called for replacing the seal, which depicts an Acehnese merchant (as seen through the lens of Salem's white aldermen in 1839).

Most people—including most Salem residents—are unaware of the city's trading history with the Aceh. Even knowing this history, it is not obvious that the man depicted on our seal is an Acehnese merchant. The average person viewing the seal likely assumes that this man is Chinese thanks to anti-Asian tropes in our visual culture. The placement of a dove with an olive branch whitewashes the violence, racism and exploitation of U.S. maritime trade with Asia during the nineteenth century. Furthermore, in the year 2026, it is grossly inappropriate for a person from a historically marginalized community to be used as a mascot or symbol.

The city began its official review of the seal over two years ago. The evaluation process has entailed multiple City Council and Racial Equity Commission meetings. A special task force established by City Council has recommended that the seal be changed. And now, hopefully, the City Council will vote to accept this recommendation.

The public discourse around the seal has been brutal and ugly. Local members of the AAPI community have been repeatedly belittled, gaslit, and ignored. Ardent supporters have focused on the intentions of the wealthy white aldermen who supposedly designed the seal as to express admiration for their Acehnese trading partners. They also have fixated on the views of a small group of Acehnese people who are honored by the seal. To justify this centering of Acehnese people, they regurgitate bastardized Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) concepts.

This effort has been led by the two designated historians of the City Seal Task Force, who were outspoken in their support for the seal before the task force had even been established. After the task force released its report with recommendations to change the seal, they released their own unofficial version in protest, which they dubbed the 'Minority Report'. This report has so many issues that there is no way it would survive a peer-review process. Several academics have refuted their whitewashed account of Salem's maritime history, including a leading scholar of Asian American history and culture on faculty at Harvard University.

I spent weeks watching City Seal Task Force and City Council meetings and reading articles cited by the 'Minority Report' and by historians who have refuted it. I have been repeatedly appalled by how intellectually dishonest and vicious the public debate has been. This has motivated me to write several articles examining my research, largely framed around refuting the current arguments for keeping the seal.
Salem City Seal - North Shore Progressives

Stand With Salem's AAPI Community

Here are things you can do to stand with the local AAPI community.

Advocate For Changing Salem’s City Seal
In a few weeks, Salem City Council will vote whether to change the current city seal. It is long overdue for city leaders to recognize that the current seal—adopted nearly 200 years ago—no longer reflects the values of our city. Unfortunately, a gaggle of belligerent locals are pressuring

In This Series

Why the Seal’s History Is Irrelevant to This Debate
Ardent supporters of Salem’s current seal maintain that its design was an expression of benevolence toward the city’s Acehnese trading partners. Because its creators had good intentions—look at that dove!—the seal cannot possibly be racist. In separate articles, I analyze the historic evidence relating to the
Why The Views of Present Day Acehnese Are Not Relevant
At the heart of the debate regarding Salem’s city seal is the question of about how we want to portray ourselves in the present day. Because a seal officially represents a city, it should embody that city’s values. Salem was a very different city in 1839. It is
Why the AAPI Community Must Be Centered in This Debate
Throughout the debate surrounding Salem’s city seal, local members of the AAPI community have been repeatedly belittled, gaslit, and ignored. Advocates for keeping the seal have fixated on the supposed good intentions of the wealthy white alderman who approved it nearly 200 years ago. They also routinely regurgitate bastardized
Examining Salem’s Seal History: Part 1
As I have written in a previous article, I believe the intentions of the aldermen who approved Salem’s seal 200 years ago have no bearing on the seal’s harmful impact on Salem’s AAPI residents and visitors today. I stand by this assertion. Nonetheless, I think it’s
Examining Salem’s City Seal History: Part 2
In the first article in this series about Salem’s maritime trade with Asia, I examined issues with Dr. R. Michael Feener and Vijay Joyce’s use of sources in their ‘Minority Report’. This article examines some additional historical context missing from this highly misleading report. Feener and Joyce maintain
Why the City Seal’s Review Process Has Not Been Rushed
Opponents to changing Salem’s city seal claim that local leaders have rushed the review process and have not given the public enough time to express their views. The reality is this process has already taken over two years. It was instigated by AAPI residents who have explained clearly why

More in Salem City Seal

See all

More from Isa Leshko

See all